Williams Was Hurt...Surprise

Well, the Bears had been insisting that Bears rookie OT Chris Williams didn't have a pre-existing condition that led to his recent injury, but as Brad Biggs tells the story:

"I had a herniated disc before I got here," Williams said after watching practice Sunday afternoon at Halas Hall. "We knew that. Everyone knew that. It just was a thing where most people it doesn't affect. It wasn't affecting me so if nothing is broke, you don't fix it. Then something happened in practice that second day, the disc started moving and that caused some problems."

[...]

The organization was [originally] adamant that Williams was not damaged goods when he was drafted and that the injury was a new one. For two weeks, the company line in camp was that he was suffering from back spasms. It took a while to get to the root of the problem. The Bears have been embarrassed to the point that they have been doing spin control since and worked over every house organ they could find. Williams also disputed a published report that he injured his back this summer in preparing for training camp.

Just so we're clear, Mr. Angelo: we don't believe anything you say. Time and again it's been made obvious that you will go beyond normal spin to the point of out-and-out lies when speaking to the press/public. The current Bears regime, when it comes to mistakes, will do anything it can to avoid admitting said mistakes.

One wonders how many more years of this we'll be forced to endure before the team brings in new management that has, y'know, some ethics.

Leadership Matters

Years ago, when the Chicago Bulls were rattling off multiple championships during the Michael Jordan era, then-GM Jerry Krause said, "Players and coaches alone don't win championships; organizations win championships." He was roundly ridiculed for this; it was seen as a snotty attempt to take credit for all the championships, especially as the one player on the teams Krause didn't acquire was Jordan.

Whatever his motivation for saying it, he was right. Hundreds or thousands of decisions led to those championships, and while Michael Jordan was perhaps the most significant piece to the puzzle, let's remember that he played for many years in the NBA before and after those championships.

As a leader, getting people to follow you requires more than mere authority. A leader must demonstrate that s/he means what s/he says; that decisions are not arbitrary nor written in sand. Many folks new to management want their subordinates to like them, but that's not required (or even advisable, in many circumstances). Most people want their bosses to simply be fair and consistent and to make some sort of sense.

Woe betide the Cincinnati Bengals, then. Yahoo Sports lays out the details, but in brief, WR Chris Henry was released early this year after punching a college student and breaking the college student's car window with a beer bottle. At the time, owner Mike Brown seemed done:

"His conduct can no longer be tolerated," Brown said at the time. "The Bengals tried for an extended period of time to support Chris and his potentially bright career. We had hoped to guide him toward an appropriate standard of personal responsibility that this community would support and that would allow him to play in the NFL. ... But those efforts end today, as we move on with what is best for our team."

Given that this was not Henry's first (or second, or third...) serious problem with the law, the decision made tremendous sense. But now Brown has flip-flopped:

Henry signed a two-year deal Tuesday with the team that let him go after he was arrested for the fifth time, a decision that seemed to mark a change in philosophy for owner Mike Brown. Instead, it was an aberration. The Bengals took him back at Brown's behest.

This isn't about the moral issue. I'm not passing judgment on Chris Henry, though clearly he needs some kind of help, and continuing to enable him isn't going to fix anything. This is about the message being sent, and it says a few things:

• Problem players can continue to be problem players and will likely get multiple chances, even if told otherwise; as such, there's no incentive to start behaving
• Players who don't have these problems should expect no reward for staying out of trouble
• Whatever management says today could change tomorrow; believe nothing

The Bengals are going to be a mess. Mark my words.

I Guess We Can Relax

Bears fans can rejoice: Kyle Orton has been named the starting quarterback:

The decision was not unexpected, considering how Grossman struggled Saturday night against Seattle. Naming Orton now gives the Bears a chance to work the first-team offense well into the second half of Thursday's third exhibition against San Francisco.

Ending last season 2-1 as the starter didn't hurt Orton's cause either.

"We take a lot of things into consideration," Smith said. "But in the end, it comes down to a gut feeling you have.

Well...hmm. I don't necessarily disagree with the decision; Rex has shown occasional flashes of brilliance, surrounded by heaping gobs of incompetence.

Still...if an employee of mine admitted -- in private, let alone in public -- that he made a major personnel decision based on a gut feeling, I'd fire him on the spot. It should NOT come down to a gut feeling; it should come down to objective analysis.

But for whatever reason we commonly put former athletes in charge of sports franchises, forgetting that most athletes didn't become successful athletes by using analysis (or even by knowing how to spell it).

Criteria for Incompetence

Part of being a leader is making decisions and then sticking to them. If you waffle, nobody will listen to you and you won't be able to lead.

On the other hand, sooner or later if you've made a poor decision, you have to cop to it. You can only insist that it's a great decision for so long before you begin to look ignorant, or arrogant, or both.

At what point, then, do we start laughing at Lovie Smith and Jerry Angelo as they continue to insist that either Rex Grossman or Kyle Orton will be the QB we need?

"We have no plans to change anything," coach Lovie Smith said.

The Bears committed to the ongoing competition between Rex Grossman and Kyle Orton. They have won with both players and think whoever emerged would give them a good chance to win in 2008.

I don't get it. Rex has been here for five years; Orton for three. We passed up several quarterbacks in the draft this year; has either Rex or Kyle justified that level of faith?

I understand the attitude of trying to back your guys, but this is insane. It's time for Angelo to come up to the podium and say, "You know what? It hasn't worked out. We were happy when we drafted Rex, and we saw a lot of things that made us think he would help take this offense to the next level. For whatever reason, that hasn't happened. We're not here to knock Rex; we just think it's time to move in a different direction."

See how you do that? Of course, it means taking an ego hit by admitting, however tacitly, that drafting Rex was a mistake.

Take the hit, Jerry. Because right now, you just look ridiculous.